Jos. Eschenbach 981508--> ASUS--> Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN

Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 03.01.2019

Summary:

.

Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN

Ванна моечная 2-секционная, емкость сварная 430х430 мм., глубина 300 мм., нерж. сталь AISI 430, толщина 0,7-0,8 мм, каркас оцинк. уголок толщиной 1,5 мм., обвязка. Габариты 1050х530х870 мм. Поставляется в разобранном…


Обзор:

Buy ASUS ZenBook UX430UN Laptop: 14" 4.5 NanoEdge FHD (1920x1080), 8th Gen Intel Core i7-8550U, 4.5 SSD, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA MX150 Graphics, Fingerprint 4.5, Backlit Keyboard, Win10 with Sleeve: Computers & Tablets - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
Unless otherwise stated, all performance claims are https://xn--c1akdc2afchgc.xn--p1ai/asus/irisk-professional-r681-10-igla-odnorazovaya-dlya-r681-01-r681-02-b.html on theoretical performance.

Actual figures may vary in real-world 4.5.

Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN

The actual transfer speed of USB 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, and/or Type-C will vary depending on many 4.5 including the processing speed of the host device, file attributes and other factors related to system configuration and your operating environment.


Aug 24, 2018 · 4.5 Asus Zenbook UX430UN I was hyped with original Zenbook UX430 back when it was released, but a lot has changed in the meantime, and as of mid 2018 the Zenbook UX430UN is 4.5 a good buy if you can find it for a really great price. It's still a nice product, don't get больше на странице wrong, but it just looks better 4.5 paper than it 4.5 in real life, 4.5.

Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN


ASUS ZenBook UX430UN Laptop - Intel Core i7 - GeForce MX150 -1080p, 16GB LPDRR3 RAM, 512GB SATA M.2 Solid State Drive, Model UX430UN-IH74-GR by ASUS
Asus ZenBook UX430UN 14" UltraBook ZenBook has always been a different kind of ultraportable notebook, but the elegant and sophisticated ZenBook UX430 is a new kind of different: we’ve crafted a travel-friendly 13-inch ZenBook with a work-friendly 14-inch display!

The UX430UN offers a bigger screen and faster GPU than the XPS 13 for hundreds less than the XPS 15.
Its chassis and keyboard are unfortunately weaker than expected and feel cheaper to the touch.
The 14-inch Asus Zenbook UX430 series can be seen as the more affordable version of the flagship 14-inch series.
Whereas the latter is thinner, lighter, and with just USB Type-C ports, the former includes more connectivity ports and the much faster GeForce MX150 option for superior gaming performance.
Users can choose between the UX430UA withUX430UN with GeForce MX150, or the UX430UQ with the aging.
All SKUs are otherwise identical in appearance with matte FHD displays, Kaby Lake or Kaby Lake-R CPUs, and up to 16 GB of LPDDR3 RAM and 512 GB of M.
The UX430 competes directly against the 13.
Then join our Team!
Especially English native speakers welcome!
Currently wanted: News and Editorial Editor - 1 USB 2.
The signature concentric brushed aluminum outer lid, tapered design, smooth surfaces, and "NanoEdge" narrow bezels all return for a very familiar visual style that is shared across the ZenBook family.
Omitted are the superficial gold chrome-cut edges and corners for a more unicolor and subtle look.
Chassis rigidity is similar to the Samsung NP900X5T but weaker than the and.
Attempting to twist the base from its front corners, for example, will result in slight bending and a small amount of creaking.
Applying moderate force on the palm rests or center of the keyboard will also slightly but visibly warp the surface.
Meanwhile, the lid is more flexible than we would like due to its narrow bezels and lack of Gorilla Glass reinforcement.
Though the distortions are minimal and far from severe when applying pressure, competing notebooks in this size category like the, XPS 13, or all offer sturdier designs.
Build quality is excellent from top to bottom on our test unit save for some minor unevenness on the rear corner of the bottom lid.
Fortunately, this is barely noticeable and only cosmetic.
In terms of size and weight, the UX430 is about 200 grams heavier and 3 mm thicker than the UX490 that costs hundreds more.
Note that the is very similar in dimensions and weight to the UX430 while offering both 360-degree hinges and touchscreen features that the Asus is missing.
The 14-inch notebook weighs about the same as many 13-inch convertibles while being a lot lighter than popular 15-inch models like the or MacBook Pro 15.
Instead of a full-size HDMI port, for example, there is an uncommon micro HDMI port.
The lack of both a Kensington Lock and support for Thunderbolt 3 will likely irk users down the line as well.
We would like to see multiple USB Type-C ports in the future for both charging and data in lieu of the dedicated AC adapter port.
Port positioning is otherwise excellent with USB Type-A on both sides and none that are too close to the front edge.
Moving 1 GB worth of photos from the card to desktop will take about 29 seconds compared to only 5 to 6 seconds on the.
We can, however, appreciate the fact that Asus has included a full-size SD reader instead of a MicroSD solution like on the latest XPS 13 or.
An fully inserted SD card will still protrude нажмите для продолжения about two-thirds of its length.
A spring-loaded reader would have been ideal for transporting purposes.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed average JPG Copy 4.5 av.
There are no 4G LTE or GPS options.
The bottom panel requires a Philips screwdriver and the same T5 hex wrench as on the or XPS 13 to remove.
Note that there are additional screws hidden underneath the rear rubber footing for a total of 10 screws.
Once removed, users are granted direct access to the 4.5 battery, M.
System RAM is soldered.
The standard one-year limited warranty applies.
Asus recommends registering new purchases online to take advantage of benefits.
The full text on the warranty card can be found.
Please see our for country-specific information.
Keyboard The chiclet keyboard ~27.
This unfortunately means that the Power button is still inconveniently close to both the Delete and Space keys and that the Directional keys are uncomfortably small.
Tactile feedback from the individual plastic keys is lighter and spongier than what we're used to on the XPS 13,or Lenovo ThinkPad series.
Travel is shallow 1.
It will take some time for typists to become fully accustomed to the weak feel of the keyboard.
On the bright side, clatter is relatively quiet and muffled.
Touchpad The trackpad 10.
While its surface area is only slightly narrower than the trackpad on the XPS 15 10.
Travel is very shallow, clatter is loud, and feedback is weak.
The surface appears to stick after each click узнать больше so inputting clicks in rapid succession is very difficult on the clickpad.
We highly recommend tapping on the clickpad surface instead or an external mouse if possible.
Fortunately, glide is uniformly smooth for reliable cursor control and two-finger scrolling.
Be careful not to hit the Power button accidentally as it is adjacent to the Delete and Backspace keys The UX430 series includes no display options other than matte 1080p whereas most Ultrabooks in this price range can have FHD or 4K UHD touchscreens.
Despite the lack of choices, the display is comparable to those on competing Ultrabooks if not a bit worse.
While contrast is excellent at about 1000:1, ghosting is somewhat more prevalent and color space is slightly narrower on the Asus.
The most notable 4.5 is the relatively dim backlight of just 300 nits ссылка на подробности that negatively impacts visibility when outdoors.
Subjectively, the matte display is nearly as sharp as a glossy display since it suffers from no major graininess issues commonly found on most other matte panels.
On the other hand, there is irrefutable pulse-width modulation on all brightness levels up to 99 percent and so users who may узнать больше здесь sensitive to onscreen flickering may want to avoid this notebook altogether.
Note that the UX430 uses a similar NV140FHM IPS panel from BOE Display as do the and.
Consequently, these three notebooks share somewhat similar display characteristics.
Note that we are unable to record the promised 100 percent sRGB coverage that Asus is advertising.
While more than sufficient for video playback and web browsing, digital artists may want a wider color gamut that many competing Ultrabooks offer such as the ones above.
Further analyses with a spectrophotometer reveal a generally accurate display even before calibration.
RGB balance and grayscale improve slightly after our calibration attempts, but the changes are difficult to notice in practice.
Color accuracy still decreases with increasing saturation level due to imperfect sRGB coverage.
Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting.
Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.
» 96 % of all devices 4.5 better.
This means that the measured response this Краскопульт пневматический JONNESWAY JA-HVLP-1080GK are is worse than the average of all tested devices 24.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.
» 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 39.
This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye.
If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display.
If PWM was продолжение здесь, an average of 9347 minimum: 43 - maximum: 4.5 Hz was measured.
Outdoor visibility is average at best even when under shade.
The display backlight is relatively dim compared to 500 nits or brighter on theXPS 13, or Samsung NP900X5T.
To Asus' credit, the matte panel helps in reducing glare compared to the glossy panels on the aforementioned examples, but this advantage is diminished by the dimmer backlight.
We recommend avoiding direct sunlight if working outdoors as much as possible.
Fortunately, the backlight is more than sufficient for indoor ambient conditions.
The UX430 series is currently shipping with, and i7-8550U Больше информации options 4.5 either integrated only or discrete GeForce MX150 with Optimus.
Our test model is the higher-end option that should cater well to casual gamers because of the Nvidia Pascal GPU.
System RAM is fixed and so we recommend avoiding the lower-end configurations that are equipped with just 4 GB of DDR4 2133 MHz RAM.
CPU performance is where we expect it to be for an i7-8550U.
CineBench scores are about 10 to 20 percent faster than the competing depending on the workload and even faster than the more power-demanding found on Смартфон ASUS ZenFone 2 Deluxe 32GB budget gaming notebooks like the.
Users who may be considering the lower-end SKUs of the UX430 with the 7th gen Kaby Lake i3-7100U or i5-7200U will be losing out on almost half the multi-thread performance and about 15 to 20 percent of single-threaded performance when compared to the i7-8550U.
As with most Ultrabooks, Turbo Boost potential is limited on the Asus.
Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop results in a very high initial score of 623 points before steadily falling to an average of 550 points as shown by our graph below.
The rough 12 percent decrease in performance is about in line with the average CineBench score of dozens of other notebooks sporting the same CPU.
Still, it's a bit unfortunate that maximum Turbo Boost is unsustainable.
See our for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
Subjectively, we can notice no performance hitches or software problems during our time with the test unit.
Internal storage is limited to a single M.
Asus is shipping SKUs with storage capacities in the 128 GB to 512 GB range sans NVMe options.
Competing Ultrabooks in this price range tend to offer NVMe as standard for almost 4x the transfer rates.
See our for more benchmark comparisons.
SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA AS SSD The Asus integrates a GeForce MX150 of the with base and memory clock rates of 1469 MHz and 1502 MHz, respectively.
The MSI PL62 with the same GPU, for example, consistently outscores our Asus in both synthetic benchmarks and games due in part to its ability to maintain higher GPU clock rates.
Nonetheless, the raw performance boost over the and especially the is still massive despite the pitfalls in clock rate.
Most demanding titles are playable at native 1080p so long as owners are satisfied with 30 FPS and Low graphical settings.
See our dedicated page on the for продолжение здесь information.
When subjected to Prime95 load to stress the CPU, clock 4.5 can be observed operating at up to 3.
The results are in line with our CineBench loop test above where the highest score was on the first run only to decline steadily thereafter.
While the drop to 2.
Running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously will throttle the processors accordingly.
Note that CPU clock rate, GPU clock rate, and Перейти temperature may cycle when under such demanding loads.
Core temperatures for both the CPU and GPU are steady in the mid 60 C to 70 C range even if one processor is not under high load since they share the same heat pipe.
Running Witcher 3 is more representative of real-world gaming loads.
Unfortunately, the GPU на этой странице unable to maintain its rated GPU Boost of 1532 MHz for very long as the clock rate eventually throttles to just 1126 MHz over time or 343 MHz slower than its rated base clock rate.
Our graph below shows that the initial 33 FPS is only achievable for the first few minutes or so before dropping down to the 28 to 30 FPS range.
Note that there are periodic dips to the low 20 FPS range likely due to background activity from pre-installed applications.
The lower-than-expected FPS count is disappointing for anyone hoping to get the full performance of the MX150 without any performance dips after long gaming sessions.
It is, however, steady compared to the heavy throttling we recorded on the Samsung NP900X5T.
CPU performance is throttled when on battery power.
A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 6001 and 3694 points, respectively, compared to 8551 and 3867 points when on mains.
CPU Clock GHz GPU Clock MHz Average CPU Temperature °C Average GPU Temperature °C Prime95 Stress 2.
The fan is generally always active and only inactive upon the first 4.5 minutes of boot up.
It's barely audible if simply web browsing or word processing for a near-silent experience.
Running higher loads like 3DMark 06 will slowly but surely bump fan noise up to 41.
This behavior is DBX 231SV 2-канальный графический эквалайзер since the benchmark is quite demanding on Ultrabooks and low-power GPUs.
Competing Ultrabooks with weaker integrated GPUs like the or run quieter by several decibels when subjected to similar loads.
Users can expect a steady fan noise of посетить страницу dB A when gaming to be comparable to many Max-Q gaming notebooks.
High-pitched electronic noise or coil whine is present on our test unit even when the system is simply idling on desktop.
The noise is only audible when in a quiet room or with an ear placed closely on the keyboard keys, but the fact that it is present in the first place can be irritating to some users.
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ Noise Surface temperatures are generally flat on both sides of the notebook when idling with the rear being only a few degrees warmer than the front.
When subjected to heavier loads, the hot spots can be as warm as 44 C.
One of these hot spots is very close to the WASD keys since the CPU is located directly underneath.
As such, users will find the left side of the keyboard to be noticeably warmer than 4.5 перейти на источник which is less than ideal when gaming.
Alternative Ultrabooks like the have more symmetrical temperature development compared to the Asus.
For word processing or streaming purposes, the Asus never becomes uncomfortable to use even if a table is unavailable.
± The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.
± The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.
Maximum volume is sufficiently loud 4.5 fill a small conference room and introduces no static or noticeable distortion.
The main issue is that the palm rests will vibrate slightly even when on lower volume settings that some users may find ссылка на страницу />Medium load as represented by 3DMark 06 will demand about 54 W or around 10 W to 15 W more than 4.5 competing 13-inch Ultrabooks.
Note that power consumption when running Witcher 3 is slightly lower since GPU Boost and CPU demands are different between Witcher 3 and 3DMark 06.
Power consumption is measurably higher during the first minute or so of stress testing because higher Turbo Boost clock rates are only achievable during this period.
Average power consumption when running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously over a 90-second period is 56 W from a small 7.
It's worth noting that we recorded a maximum draw of 66 W as shown by our graph below, but this occurred very early in our stress test for a very short period.
Prime95 initiated at the 20s mark.
Note that power consumption is highest only for the first 30 seconds or so before tapering down Prime95+FurMark initiated at the 20s mark.
Note that power consumption tapers off as maximum Turbo Boost is unsustainable 8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.
Results are unsurprisingly comparable to Asus' other 14-inch Ultrabook, the ZenBook UX490, while being a bit better than the and its higher resolution 4K UHD display.
Charging from near empty to full capacity is very slow on the UX430 at about 3 hours with the included AC adapter.
In comparison, most notebooks take only 1.
The few standout features are the crisp matte display and thin design, but nearly everything else is average at best or unremarkable.
Brightness is dimmer than competing Приведу ссылку, the chassis is comparatively more flexible, the trackpad is soft, and the keyboard keys could have been firmer.
When diving deeper into the hardware, it is disappointing to find coil whine and a throttling GPU that is unable to sustain even its base clock rate over взято отсюда />Its specifications are impressive with an 8th gen Core i7 CPU, 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB SSD, and even dedicated GeForce Pascal graphics.
From this perspective, the UX430UN can be considered excellent value for the performance so long as users are aware of its laundry list of drawbacks.
Great specs for a great price.
The actual hardware, however, could use improvement on nearly all fronts to better compete in the 4-digit price range.
We hope to see a more rigid design and a brighter display for improved outdoor usability in future iterations.
After graduating with a B.
NRC to operate nuclear reactors.
There's a striking level of appreciation you gain for everyday consumer electronics after working with modern nuclear reactivity systems astonishingly powered by computers from the 80s.
When I'm not managing day-to-day activities and US review articles on Notebookcheck, you can catch me following the eSports scene and the latest gaming news.

Ноутбук ASUS ZenBook UX430UN

Комментарии 3

  • Этого не может быть!

  • Я считаю, что Вы не правы. Я уверен. Могу отстоять свою позицию. Пишите мне в PM, обсудим.

  • Спасибо за эту информацию, однако осмелюсь внести долю критики, мне кажется автор перестарался с изложением фактов, и статья получилась довольно академичной и сухой.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *